ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2025
Distinct neural dynamics in joint versus side-by-side actions: insights from dual EEG.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An evolutionary conserved neural mechanism for interpersonal coordination in primates.Science advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The distinction between acting jointly and acting side-by-side permeates our daily lives and is crucial for understanding the evolution and development of human sociality. While acting in parallel involves agents pursuing individual goals, acting jointly requires them to share a collective goal. We used dual EEG to investigate neural dynamics underlying these action types. We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) from 20 dyads while they had to transport an object in a video game, either jointly or in parallel. Conditions were matched for task execution complexity, confirmed by equal success rates. Results revealed a distinctive pattern swap in ERPs during action preparation. Early preparation showed significantly higher amplitude during joint versus parallel action. This pattern reversed in late preparation, with significantly reduced ERP amplitude in joint compared to parallel action. Notably, decreased late ERPs correlated with higher RT variability in partners but not participants' own RT variability. This dynamic swap suggests different cognitive processes operate at distinct stages of action preparation. Sharing a collective goal may impose cognitive costs (reflected in higher early ERPs), but this is offset by facilitated late action preparation (as shown by reduced late ERPs), likely due to the enhanced predictability of partners' actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.