Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40705664›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Efficient gene set analysis for DNA methylation addressing probe dependency and bias.

Zongli Xu, Alison A Motsinger-Reif, Liang Niu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comprehensive genomics and functional analyses identifyTranslational cancer research · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zongli XuBiostatistics & Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9034-8902
Alison A Motsinger-ReifBiostatistics & Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States.
Liang NiuDepartment of Biostatistics, Health Informatics and Data Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2473-9745

Funding

NIEHS NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationGene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) is widely used to interpret DNA methylation data by associating differentially methylated sites with biological pathways. However, existing GSEA methods struggle with several challenges in methylation data, including probe dependency, probe number bias, and the complexity of gene-probe mapping. These limitations can lead to biased enrichment results, reduced statistical power, and computational inefficiencies.

resultsWe introduce gsGene and gsPG, two novel GSEA methods specifically designed for DNA methylation data. gsGene aggregates association signals at gene level while correcting for probe dependency and probe number bias, enabling more biologically meaningful enrichment analysis. gsPG takes a different approach by conducting gene set enrichment using summary statistics for independent probe groups based on gene annotation, mitigating biases from multi-mapping probes. Both methods improve computational efficiency, enhance statistical power, and effectively control type I error rates. Comprehensive evaluations in two large datasets demonstrate superior performance compared to existing methods. Furthermore, we propose a novel beta distribution fitting strategy to improve enrichment P-value estimation, providing a computationally efficient alternative to traditional permutation-based gene set methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: These methods are implemented in the R package dmGsea, which is freely available on GitHub and Bioconductor (DOI: 10.18129/B9.bioc.dmGsea). The package supports Illumina 450K, EPIC, and mouse methylation arrays and can be extended to other omics data with user-provided probe-to-gene mapping annotations.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDNA MethylationAlgorithmsHumansSoftware

Identifiers

PMID40705664
PMCPMC12341679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.