ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Efficient gene set analysis for DNA methylation addressing probe dependency and bias.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In-Silico identification and optimization of therapeutic peptides against breast cancer via transcriptomic profiling.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Comprehensive genomics and functional analyses identifyTranslational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationGene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) is widely used to interpret DNA methylation data by associating differentially methylated sites with biological pathways. However, existing GSEA methods struggle with several challenges in methylation data, including probe dependency, probe number bias, and the complexity of gene-probe mapping. These limitations can lead to biased enrichment results, reduced statistical power, and computational inefficiencies.
resultsWe introduce gsGene and gsPG, two novel GSEA methods specifically designed for DNA methylation data. gsGene aggregates association signals at gene level while correcting for probe dependency and probe number bias, enabling more biologically meaningful enrichment analysis. gsPG takes a different approach by conducting gene set enrichment using summary statistics for independent probe groups based on gene annotation, mitigating biases from multi-mapping probes. Both methods improve computational efficiency, enhance statistical power, and effectively control type I error rates. Comprehensive evaluations in two large datasets demonstrate superior performance compared to existing methods. Furthermore, we propose a novel beta distribution fitting strategy to improve enrichment P-value estimation, providing a computationally efficient alternative to traditional permutation-based gene set methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: These methods are implemented in the R package dmGsea, which is freely available on GitHub and Bioconductor (DOI: 10.18129/B9.bioc.dmGsea). The package supports Illumina 450K, EPIC, and mouse methylation arrays and can be extended to other omics data with user-provided probe-to-gene mapping annotations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.