ArticleBiometrics2025
Using model-assisted calibration methods to improve efficiency of regression analyses using two-phase samples or pooled samples under complex survey designs.
Article in Biometrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Two-phase sampling designs are frequently applied in epidemiological studies and large-scale health surveys. In such designs, certain variables are collected exclusively within a second-phase random subsample of the initial first-phase sample, often due to factors such as high costs, response burden, or constraints on data collection or assessment. Consequently, second-phase sample estimators can be inefficient due to the diminished sample size. Model-assisted calibration methods have been used to improve the efficiency of second-phase estimators in regression analysis. However, limited literature provides valid finite population inferences of the calibration estimators that use appropriate calibration auxiliary variables while simultaneously accounting for the complex sample designs in the first- and second-phase samples. Moreover, no literature considers the "pooled design" where some covariates are measured exclusively in certain repeated survey cycles. This paper proposes calibrating the sample weights for the second-phase sample to the weighted first-phase sample based on score functions of the regression model that uses predictions of the second-phase variable for the first-phase sample. We establish the consistency of estimation using calibrated weights and provide variance estimation for the regression coefficients under the two-phase design or the pooled design nested within complex survey designs. Empirical evidence highlights the efficiency and robustness of the proposed calibration compared to existing calibration and imputation methods. Data examples from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey are provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.