Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40705493›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2025

Sparse 2-stage Bayesian meta-analysis for individualized treatments.

Junwei Shen, Erica E M Moodie, Shirin Golchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junwei ShenDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec H3A 1G1, Canada.
Erica E M MoodieDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec H3A 1G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7225-3977
Shirin GolchiDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec H3A 1G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3382-9563

Funding

CIHR FDN-16726Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individualized treatment rules tailor treatments to patients based on clinical, demographic, and other characteristics. Estimation of individualized treatment rules requires the identification of individuals who benefit most from the particular treatments and thus the detection of variability in treatment effects. To develop an effective individualized treatment rule, data from multisite studies may be required due to the low power provided by smaller datasets for detecting the often small treatment-covariate interactions. However, sharing of individual-level data is sometimes constrained. Furthermore, sparsity may arise in 2 senses: different data sites may recruit from different populations, making it infeasible to estimate identical models or all parameters of interest at all sites, and the number of non-zero parameters in the model for the treatment rule may be small. To address these issues, we adopt a 2-stage Bayesian meta-analysis approach to estimate individualized treatment rules which optimize expected patient outcomes using multisite data without disclosing individual-level data beyond the sites. Simulation results demonstrate that our approach can provide consistent estimates of the parameters which fully characterize the optimal individualized treatment rule. We estimate the optimal Warfarin dose strategy using data from the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium, where data sparsity and small treatment-covariate interaction effects pose additional statistical challenges.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicPrecision MedicineAnticoagulantsBayes TheoremBiometryComputer SimulationHumansModels, StatisticalWarfarinAnticoagulantsWarfarinBayesian meta-analysisindividualized treatment rulesmultisite studiespersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID40705493
PMCPMC12288668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.