ArticleEuropean endodontic journal2025
Student's Perception Towards Endodontic Training with Artificial Teeth: What Has Changed?
Article in European endodontic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Research to Education: When Natural Teeth Are the Only Reference-Student Perceptions of PolyJet™ 3D-Printed Teeth in Endodontic Training.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Does Aging Affect PolyJet™ 3D-Printed Teeth for Endodontics? A Micro-CT Evaluation.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- A reproducible optical-microscopic framework for evaluating electronic apex locator performance in different irrigants using 3D-printed transparent resin teeth.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Does Printing Orientation Matter in PolyJet 3D Printed Teeth for Endodontics? A Micro-CT Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study assessed students' perceptions of artificial teeth (AT) after completing the Endodontics I, II, and III curricular units at the Faculty of Health Sciences, Fernando Pessoa University, Porto, Portugal. Additionally, the study aims to review existing literature on students' perceptions of three-dimensional (3D) printed models used in pre-clinical training, identifying current challenges and future needs for improvement.
methodsA questionnaire was adapted, consisting of 24 questions, using a 5-point Likert scale, from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree), in which students had to compare AT with natural teeth (NT) in various aspects of anatomy and endodontic procedures. For the review of literature, a search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science up to March 16, 2025. The search included the keywords: endodontics; natural teeth; artificial teeth; 3D printed teeth; teaching; pre-clinical training and dental education, both individually and in combination using the Boolean operator 'AND'. Relevant original research studies and review articles, published in English were selected without time restrictions. Additionally, cross-references were examined for further relevant studies.
resultsOverall, students expressed a favorable opinion of AT in relation to external anatomy, radiopacity with files or gutta-percha, ease of acquisition, superior hygiene, and the simplicity of performing endodontic procedures. Conversely, students reported negative perceptions of AT concerning internal anatomy, pulp chamber size, canal shape and size, radiopacity, tactile sensation during access cavity preparation and pulp chamber entry, tactile feedback during endodontic procedures and debris removal, and the adequacy of AT for understanding endodontic techniques.
conclusionThe incorporation of AT into endodontic training represents a significant advancement toward standardization and improved efficiency in dental education. However, AT cannot fully replicate the tactile feedback and anatomical characteristics of NT. Although AT offers advantages in terms of consistency and availability, their limitations in mimicking the tactile sensation and radiopacity remain critical factors influencing students' perceptions. These findings underscore the need for continued development of AT that more closely mimics the properties of NT. (EEJ-2025-03-047).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.