ReviewEuropean endodontic journal2025
Undergraduate Endodontic Teaching in Dental Schools Around the World: A Narrative Review.
Review in European endodontic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of Hypercementosis in Radiographic Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Clinical Implications for Endodontic Assessment.International endodontic journal · 2026Pooled it
- Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns for Pulpitis in Pediatric Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From Research to Education: When Natural Teeth Are the Only Reference-Student Perceptions of PolyJet™ 3D-Printed Teeth in Endodontic Training.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Over-Prescription of Antibiotics for Pulpitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional Surveys.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Student's Perception Towards Endodontic Training with Artificial Teeth: What Has Changed?European endodontic journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review aims to analyze the published data regarding undergraduate teaching of Endodontics throughout the world. A literature survey was conducted to identify articles about undergraduate endodontic teaching, using the following combinations of keywords: (endodontic OR endodontics OR endodontology) AND (teaching OR training OR education OR curriculum) AND (undergraduate OR pre-graduate) AND (evaluation OR assessment) AND (dental schools OR dental faculty). The inclusion criteria established were studies published in the last 10 years, in which those responsible for teaching endodontics reported some data about the undergraduate training of endodontics in dental schools around the world. The data provided by the included studies were extracted and organized into five sections: 1) General characteristics of teaching endodontics in the dental curriculum, 2) Teaching methodology in endodontic training, 3) Root canal treatment protocol used in undergraduate endodontic teaching, 4) Use of contemporary materials and technologies in endodontic training, and 5) Assessment methodology in endodontic training. The data found in the published studies show great consistency and, compared with the data found in studies carried out decades ago, allow us to conclude that the quality of endodontic teaching in dental schools around the world has increased substantially. However, there is stillroom for improvement in some aspects, especially the incorporation of new technologies and materials into the teaching of endodontics at the undergraduate level. This is the case of magnification, ultrasound and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). (EEJ-2025-03-030).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.