Trial reportEuropean endodontic journal2025
Evaluation of the Anaesthetic Efficacies of Three Different Formulations of Intraligamentary Injections for Hypertensive Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomised Controlled Trial.
Trial report in European endodontic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This double-blinded randomised clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy of lignocaine, diclofenac sodium and ketorolac tromethamine as supplemental intraligamentary injections for intra-appointment pain in normotensive and hypertensive patients with moderate to severe symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. METHODOLOGY: Ethical clearance was obtained, and the trial was registered on the Clinical Trial Registry India (CTRI/2020/09/027635; Registered on 07/09/2020). A total of 198 patients were divided into two groups-hypertensive group (Group 1; n=99) and normotensive (healthy) group (Group 2; n=99). After computerised randomisation and double blinding, participants were subdivided into three subgroups-1A/2A: lignocaine (n=33), 1B/2B: diclofenac sodium (n=33) and 1C/2C: ketorolac tromethamine (n=33). The preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores was recorded. For the hypertensive group, blood pressure was recorded, and inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) comprising 1.8ml of 2% lignocaine without adrenaline was administered. For the normotensive group, IANB with 1.8ml of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline was administered. A supplemental intraligamentary injection comprising one of the experimental drugs was injected to both the groups. Endodontic access was gained, and the intraoperative VAS score was recorded. As part of the statistical analysis, paired t-tests, Tukey's post hoc test and ANOVA were performed using SPSS software version 20.
resultsSupplemental intraligamentary injections of diclofenac sodium and ketorolac tromethamine showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) compared to lignocaine in the reduction of intraoperative pain with no side effects in hypertensive and healthy individuals.
conclusionSupplemental injections of both NSAIDs performed better than lignocaine in reducing intraoperative pain among healthy and hypertensive individuals. (EEJ-2023-06-076).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.