Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40705436›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Sodium Oxybate as a Potential New Treatment for Catatonia in Patients With Depression, Bipolar Disorder, or a Psychotic Disorder: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lilian Bot, Josine G van Mill, Laetitia J C A Smarius, Adriaan W Hoogendoorn, Bram W C Storosum, Christiaan H Vinkers, Gabriel E Jacobs, Gert Jan Lammers, Hanna M Heller, Jantine C A Colen-de Koning and 9 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Lilian BotDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3387-9739
Josine G van MillDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0009-8793-1839
Laetitia J C A SmariusDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6145-8037
Adriaan W HoogendoornDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4784-0712
Bram W C StorosumSpecialized Mental Health Care, Arkin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0764-8745
Christiaan H VinkersDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3698-0744
Gabriel E JacobsDepartment of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5140-9450
Gert Jan LammersDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4755-7060
Hanna M HellerDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5571-1091
Jantine C A Colen-de KoningDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0006-4323-0430
Joris J B van der VlugtDepartment of Psychiatry, Molenaar Antes - Parnassiagroep, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0004-2563-5747
Marloes S OudijnDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4079-4899
Martijn S van NoordenDepartment of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4156-4112
Pierre M BetCompulsivity Impulsivity and Attention, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6735-7379
Rolf FronczekDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1935-7603
Heleen S van der HeijdenDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0707-5075
Sjors M M LangeSpecialized Mental Health Care, GGZ Centraal, Hilversum, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3843-9372
Ysbrand D van der WerfCompulsivity Impulsivity and Attention, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2370-9584
Eric R van ExelDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5737-9600

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCatatonia is a severe psychomotor syndrome predominantly associated with depressive, bipolar, and psychotic disorders. Untreated catatonia has a 10% mortality rate and may lead to complications such as renal failure, rhabdomyolysis, pneumonia, embolism, and contractures. High doses of the benzodiazepine lorazepam, a gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-A receptor modulator, are the primary pharmacological treatment, enhancing GABA's inhibitory effect, potentially reducing symptoms of catatonia. However, lorazepam is ineffective in about 25% of cases, leaving electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) as the only well-investigated alternative. Although often effective, ECT may have severe side effects and is not easily accepted among patients and caregivers. Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel therapies for catatonia. Sodium oxybate, a GABA precursor and GABA-B receptor agonist, is a promising alternative treatment based on observational data, but its efficacy has never been thoroughly investigated.

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sodium oxybate in treating catatonia unresponsive to lorazepam, while also capturing the natural course and determinants of catatonia through an observational cohort.

methodsThe Laborit trial consists of a cohort study and an embedded single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT). Patients with catatonia admitted to a psychiatric ward may join the study's cohort, where their clinical characteristics are recorded. Standard care, including lorazepam up to 24 mg/day, will be administered. On day 4, the Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) will be used to measure symptom response. Patients with ≤50% improvement on the BFCRS, compared to the score at start, will be eligible for the trial. A total of 42 patients will be randomly assigned to either the sodium oxybate group, after a 2-day lorazepam reduction period, or the continuation of lorazepam. The primary endpoint is response, measured by the BFCRS score change after 4 days of treatment. A ≥50% reduction in BFCRS will define a responder, who will continue allocated treatment for an additional 10 days, with a secondary endpoint at 14 days. Data will be analyzed using intention-to-treat and per-protocol methods, with chi-square and logistic regression tests to compare group response and remission rates.

resultsThis study was funded by the Dutch Brain Foundation (Hersenstichting) in December 2020. The study protocol was approved by the Amsterdam UMC Ethics Board on May 22, 2023. As of March 2025, the first 4 participants have been included in the cohort, with no trial participants enrolled yet.

conclusionsIf positive, the results of this RCT may pave the way for international catatonia researchers and clinicians to introduce a new pharmacological treatment option for catatonia. Implementation could potentially benefit patients who endure this severe syndrome and present health care professionals with an additional treatment option.

trial registrationISRCTN ISRCTN11236443; https://tinyurl.com/4px5s4aa. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/68356.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderCatatoniaDepressionPsychotic DisordersSodium OxybateAdultFemaleHumansLorazepamMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeLorazepamSodium OxybatecatatoniaGABAgamma-aminobutyric acidlorazepamsodium oxybate

Identifiers

PMID40705436
PMCPMC12332447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.