Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40705434›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2025

Leveraging AI to Investigate Child Maltreatment Text Narratives: Promising Benefits and Addressable Risks.

Wilson Lukmanjaya, Tony Butler, Sarah Cox, Oscar Perez-Concha, Leah Bromfield, George Karystianis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wilson LukmanjayaSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, F25, Samuels Building, Samuel Terry Ave, Kensington, Sydney, 2033, Australia, 61 293853136, 61 93136185.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7747-4648
Tony ButlerSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, F25, Samuels Building, Samuel Terry Ave, Kensington, Sydney, 2033, Australia, 61 293853136, 61 93136185.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2679-2769
Sarah CoxAustralian Center for Child Protection, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0670-0692
Oscar Perez-ConchaCentre for Big Data Resarch in Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8823-7090
Leah BromfieldAustralian Center for Child Protection, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4263-5878
George KarystianisSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, F25, Samuels Building, Samuel Terry Ave, Kensington, Sydney, 2033, Australia, 61 293853136, 61 93136185.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3491-361X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: The trove of information contained in child maltreatment narratives represents an opportunity to strengthen the evidence base for policy reform in this area, yet it remains underutilized by researchers and policy makers. Current research into child maltreatment often involves the use of qualitative methodologies or structured survey data that are either too broad or not representative, thereby limiting the development of effective policy responses and intervention strategies. Artificial intelligence (AI) approaches such as large language models (AI models that understand and generate language) can analyze large volumes of child maltreatment narratives by extracting population-level insights on factors of interest such as mental health and treatment needs. However, when applying such methods, it is useful to have a framework on which to base approaches to the data. We propose a seven step framework: (1) data governance; (2) researcher vetting; (3) data deidentification; (4) data access; (5) feasibility testing of baseline methods; (6) large-scale implementation of black box algorithms; and (7) domain expert result validation for such exercises to ensure careful execution and limit the risk of privacy and security breaches, bias, and unreliable conclusions.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebenefits and riskschild maltreatment narrativeslarge language modelsresearch frameworktext mining

Identifiers

PMID40705434
PMCPMC12288702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.