Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40705333›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Microbiota Transplantation Among Patients Receiving Long-Term Care: The Sentinel REACT Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Michael H Woodworth, Ahmed Babiker, Radhika Prakash-Asrani, C Christina Mehta, Danielle Barrios Steed, Amanda Ashley, Dylan Koundakjian, Adi Acharya, Lori Grooms, Chris W Bower and 13 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05780801 (Sentinel Cohort for the Response to Emerging Antimicrobial Resistance With Containment Microbiota Restoration Therapy Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05780801 phase1completednot on this map

Sentinel Cohort for the Response to Emerging Antimicrobial Resistance With Containment Microbiota Restoration Therapy Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorEmory UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled10ConditionsMulti-Drug Resistant OrganismArmsAllogeneic Microbiota in Glycerol (10%) (AMG)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Michael H WoodworthDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ahmed BabikerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Radhika Prakash-AsraniDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
C Christina MehtaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Danielle Barrios SteedDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Amanda AshleyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Dylan KoundakjianDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Adi AcharyaEmory Long Term Acute Care, Decatur, Georgia.
Lori GroomsEmory Long Term Acute Care, Decatur, Georgia.
Chris W BowerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Deepti R SuchindranDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Twinkle TrehanDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Alison Laufer HalpinDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Maroya Spalding WaltersDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Sujan C ReddyDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Matthew H SamoreDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Mary-Claire RoghmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Mary K HaydenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Julia Van RielDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Eileen M BurdDepartment of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Sarah LohsenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Sarah W SatolaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Scott K FridkinDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG)UM1AI104681 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Vance G. Fowler, Henry F HENRY CHAMBERS · 2013 to 2026
$180.8M
Emory R38 Research Training ProgramR38AI174306 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Nadine Georges Rouphael · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
Temporal dynamics of MDRO eradication after FMTK23AI144036 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI WOODWORTH, MICHAEL HOLMES · 2019 to 2023
$957k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI144036NIAID NIH HHS R38 AI174306NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI104681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Intestinal multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) colonization is highly prevalent in long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) patients and is associated with MDRO infection and transmission. However, there are no therapies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to reduce intestinal MDRO colonization. Objective: To determine the safety and acceptability of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in LTACH patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center, open-label nonrandomized clinical trial was conducted from April to December 2023 at an LTACH in the Southeastern US with median 50-patient census and 28-day length of stay. Patients with MDRO colonization were identified by perirectal prevalence sampling. Patients colonized with at least 1 target MDRO were approached for informed consent for FMT. FMT recipients were compared with untreated controls with MDRO colonization. Data were analyzed from August 2024 to May 2025. Intervention: Healthy donor fecal microbiota (50-100 g stool and 250 mL normal saline with 9% glycerol) instilled via gastrostomy tube or enema without antibiotic or bowel preparation conditioning. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was frequency and severity of adverse events. Solicited adverse events were recorded for 7 days. Unsolicited adverse events were recorded for 6 months. Four weekly perirectal MDRO cultures were performed after FMT. Results: A total of 42 patients, including 10 (mean [SD] age, 63.8 (14.5) years; 7 [70%] female) who received FMT and 32 contemporaneous controls (mean [SD] age, 64.0 [13.7] years; 13 [41%] female) were assessed. In 2 prevalence surveys, 23 of 32 (72%) and 26 of 34 (77%) perirectal cultures grew at least 1 MDRO. Among the FMT group, 5 patients received FMT via gastrostomy alone, 4 via enema alone, and 1 with both routes more than 30 days apart. No serious adverse events were attributed to FMT, and post-FMT solicited adverse events were mild. At final visit, all perirectal cultures from FMT recipients grew at least 1 MDRO. Post hoc analyses found numerically fewer FMT recipients had positive blood culture results (0 individuals vs 6 individuals [19%]; P = .31), pathogen intestinal dominance (2 of 8 individuals [25%] vs 4 of 8 individuals [50%]; P = .61), and 7 fewer days of antibiotic therapy per 1000 patient days (median [IQR], 12.6 [0-25.2] days vs 19.7 [6.5-36.1] days; P = .38) compared with controls in the 6 months after prevalence survey, although these differences were not statistically significant. Accounting for higher baseline FMT recipient antibiotic use, difference-in-differences analysis estimated 26 (95% CI, -64 to 12) fewer days of antibiotic therapy per 1000 patient-days after FMT, although this difference was also not statistically significant. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nonrandomized pilot clinical trial, FMT was acceptable for LTACH patients without related serious adverse events. Although not powered to test these outcomes, this study found potential reductions in bacteremia, intestinal pathogen domination, and antibiotic use associated with FMT, suggesting FMT should be evaluated in larger, randomized trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05780801.

Indexed as

Fecal Microbiota TransplantationLong-Term CareAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID40705333
PMCPMC12290730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.