Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40705330›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Modified Target Delineation and Moderately Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for High-Grade Glioma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Liangzhi Zhong, Pu Zhou, Lu Chen, Diangang Chen, Li Wen, Xinwei Diao, Anmei Zhang, Yixing Gao, Guangpeng Chen, Xueqin Li and 6 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Liangzhi ZhongCancer Research Institute of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Pu ZhouDepartment of Oncology, Shapingba Hospital affiliated to Chongqing University, Chongqing University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Lu ChenCancer Research Institute of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Diangang ChenCancer Research Institute of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Li WenDepartment of Radiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Xinwei DiaoDepartment of Pathology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Anmei ZhangCancer Research Institute of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Yixing GaoCancer Research Institute of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Guangpeng ChenCancer Research Institute of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Xueqin LiCancer Research Institute of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Shaojiang HuangCancer Research Institute of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Kai NiuCancer Research Institute of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Yuchun PeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Guolong LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Shengqing LvDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Guanghui LiCancer Research Institute of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Optimizing irradiation volumes and evaluating the effect of dose escalation on total and fractionated doses are critical for improving outcomes in high-grade glioma (HGG). Objective: To assess the efficacy of modified target delineation guided by multimodal magnetic resonance imaging and white matter tracts combined with moderately hypofractionated simultaneous boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (HSIB-IMRT) in patients with newly diagnosed HGG. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center, 2-arm, open-label randomized clinical trial enrolled 154 patients aged 18 to 70 years with histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed HGG at a Chinese medical center from January 1, 2018, to August 31, 2022. Follow-up was completed in June 2024. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive modified target delineation guided by multimodal magnetic resonance imaging and white matter tracts combined with HSIB-IMRT (experimental arm) or standard IMRT per guideline recommendations (standard arm). Both arms received concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end point was overall survival (OS). Results: Among 154 enrolled patients (76 in the experimental arm and 78 in the standard arm; 85 [55.2%] male; median [range] age, 51.5 [23.0-70.0] years), the median (range) follow-up duration was 22 (4-76) months, with 96 deaths by June 2024. The median PFS was 15.5 months (95% CI, 11.7-19.3 months) in the experimental arm and 13.5 months (95% CI, 8.7-18.3 months) in the standard arm (P = .89). The median OS was 27.0 months (95% CI, 13.9-40.1 months) in the experimental arm and 21.0 months (95% CI, 18.0-24.0 months) in the standard arm (P = .24). The clinical target volume in the experimental arm (CTV1: median [range], 116.7 [20.2-370.7 cm3]; CTV2: median [range], 174.4 [34.5-463.2 cm3]) was significantly smaller than the clinical target volume in the standard arm (median [range], 225.0 [70.2-542.1 cm3]; P < .001). Recurrence rates within, outside, and multicentric to the target volume were comparable between arms. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 4 patients (5.3%) in the experimental arm and 3 (3.8%) in the standard arm (P = .72). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, modified target delineation with HSIB-IMRT demonstrated comparable PFS and OS to standard IMRT in patients with newly diagnosed HGG, while significantly reducing the irradiation target volume without increasing the recurrence rates outside the target volume. These results suggest valuable insights for future research aimed at personalized, reduced volume strategies to optimize outcomes and minimize neurotoxicity in HGG. Trial Registration: ChiCTR.org.cn Identifier: ChiCTR1800014396.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaRadiation Dose HypofractionationRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedTemozolomideYoung AdultTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID40705330
PMCPMC12290737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.