Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40705321›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2025

Sequential vs Induction Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Fen Xue, Dan Ou, Congying Xie, Shaojun Lin, Jingao Li, Xiaozhong Chen, Fuzheng Zhang, Hongmei Ying, Xueguan Lu, Chunying Shen and 8 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03366415 (Non-inferiority Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Sequential Chemoradiotherapy With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03366415 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Non-inferiority Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Sequential Chemoradiotherapy With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorChaosu HuRan2018 to 2024Enrolled420ConditionsNasopharyngeal CarcinomaArmsgemcitabine and cisplatin (Induction and adjuvant chemotherapy), IMRT, gemcitabine and cisplatin (Induction chemotherapy), IMRT and concurrent cisplatin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Error in Figure 1.JAMA oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Fen XueDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Dan OuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Congying XieDepartment of Radiation and Medical Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Shaojun LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Jingao LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China.
Xiaozhong ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Fuzheng ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
Hongmei YingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Xueguan LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Chunying ShenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Tingting XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Xiaomin OuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Weiwei LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Xin ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Chengrun DuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Changming ZhouDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chaosu HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Xiayun HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Induction chemotherapy (IC) plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been a standard treatment for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) but with high acute toxic effects in CCRT phase. Whether CCRT can be safely replaced by radiation therapy with adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is unknown. Objective: To assess if sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT; IC, followed by radiotherapy alone, followed by AC) is noninferior to IC plus CCRT for LA-NPC in terms of efficacy, with less acute toxic effects. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, open-label, phase 3 noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted from January 2018 to September 2021 in 6 centers in China. Patients aged 18 to 65 years with newly diagnosed stage III/IVA NPC were enrolled. The data cutoff date was June 30, 2024. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 2 cycles of IC with a gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) regimen (gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin, 25 mg/m2, on days 1, 2, and 3, repeated every 3 weeks) plus radiotherapy alone, followed by 2 cycles of AC with a GP regimen (SCRT group) or 2 cycles IC (GP regimen) followed by radiotherapy concurrent with weekly cisplatin, 30 mg/m2 (IC plus CCRT group). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end points were 3-year failure-free survival (FFS) with a noninferiority margin of 10% (hazard ratio [HR] less than 1.6) and the incidence of grade 3 or higher acute mucositis during radiotherapy. The secondary end points included overall survival, locoregional FFS, distant FFS, response rate, and toxic effects. Results: Of 420 enrolled patients, 107 (25.5%) were women, and the median (IQR) age was 48 (41-54) years. A total of 210 patients were randomized to the SCRT group and 210 to the IC plus CCRT group. The median (IQR) follow-up time was 50 (40-61) months. In the intention-to-treat population, 3-year FFS was 83.7% (95% CI, 78.6-88.8) vs 79.5% (95% CI, 74.0-85.0) in the SCRT group vs the IC plus CCRT group, respectively (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.50-1.19; P = .24), with the upper bound of the 95% CI less than 1.6. Identical outcomes were reported in the per-protocol population. Compared with the IC plus CCRT group, the SCRT group had significantly lower incidences of grade 3 or higher acute nonhematological toxic effects (acute mucositis, 61 [29.0%] vs 88 [41.9%], respectively; P < .001; nausea, 20 [9.5%] vs 38[18.1%], respectively; P = .01; vomiting, 8 [3.8%] vs 20 [9.5%], respectively; P = .02). No differences were observed in late toxic effects. Conclusions and Relevance: Results from this noninferiority randomized clinical trial suggest that SCRT is noninferior to IC plus CCRT in terms of 3-year FFS in LA-NPC, with less severe acute nonhematological toxic effects. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03366415.

Identifiers

PMID40705321
PMCPMC12290906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.