ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025
An approach for cancer outcomes modelling using a comprehensive synthetic dataset.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Limited patient data availability presents a challenge for efficient machine learning (ML) model development. Recent studies have proposed methods to generate synthetic medical images but lack the corresponding prognostic information required for predicting outcomes. We present a cancer outcomes modelling approach that involves generating a comprehensive synthetic dataset which can accurately mimic a real dataset. A real public dataset containing computed tomography-based radiomic features and clinical information for 132 non-small cell lung cancer patients was used. A synthetic dataset of virtual patients was synthesized using a conditional tabular generative adversarial network. Models to predict two-year overall survival were trained on real or synthetic data using combinations of four feature selection methods (mutual information, ANOVA F-test, recursive feature elimination, random forest (RF) importance weights) and six ML algorithms (RF, k-nearest neighbours, logistic regression, support vector machine, XGBoost, Gaussian Naïve Bayes). Models were tested on withheld real data and externally validated. Real and synthetic datasets were similar, with an average one minus Kolmogorov-Smirnov test statistic of 0.871 for continuous features. Chi-square test confirmed agreement for discrete features (p < 0.001). XGBoost using RF importance-based features performed the most consistently for both datasets, with percent differences in balanced accuracy and area under the precision-recall curve of < 1.3%. Preliminary findings demonstrate the potential application of synthetic radiomic and clinical data augmentation for cancer outcomes modelling, although further validation with larger diverse datasets is crucial. While our approach was described in a lung context, it may be applied to other sites or endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40705274What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.