ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2026
Emotion Regulation Strategies Related To Problem Behaviors in Teenagers: A Latent Profile Analysis.
Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between anxiety symptoms on risky e-biking riding behavior among adolescents: based on gut-brain axis.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explored the latent heterogeneity of emotion regulation strategies among adolescents and their associations with problem behaviors. Using a sample of Chinese middle school students, we identified distinct profiles of emotion regulation strategies through latent profile analysis. Participants were asked to complete the Emotion Regulation Scale (ERS), the eleven-item Kutcher Adolescent Depression Scale (KADS-11), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale (GAD-7), the Ten-Item Internet Gaming Disorder Test (IGDT-10) and the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP). Results revealed four subgroups: low, moderate, adaptive and high emotion regulation strategies profile. Adolescents in non-adaptive profiles (low, moderate or high strategies) exhibited higher risks of depression, anxiety, Internet gaming disorder (IGD), and phubbing, whereas the adaptive profile was protective against these problem behaviors. The findings underscore the critical need to prioritize emotion regulation strategies in interventions aimed at mitigating adolescents' risks of internalizing and externalizing problems. The results further emphasize the necessity of adopting tailored approaches that align with individuals' unique regulatory patterns, ensuring interventions are both precision-driven and effective in addressing the diverse emotional regulation needs of adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40705241What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.