Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40705235›Full record

ArticleAmbio2026

Online trade of wild game meat: Implications for public health and conservation.

Tomohiko Endo, Kota Mameno, Takahiro Kubo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tomohiko EndoBiodiversity Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8506, Japan.
Kota MamenoResearch Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Kita 9 Nishi 9, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8589, Japan.
Takahiro KuboBiodiversity Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8506, Japan. kubo.takahiro@nies.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4832-5539

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London 19H03095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trade in wild game meat (WGM) is increasing in online markets. However, the distribution of WGM in online trade remains unclear, and our limited knowledge has prevented sustainable WGM consumption that reduces the risks to human health and overcomes the challenges in wildlife management and biodiversity conservation. To explore the trends and challenges of online transactions of WGM, we analyzed the sales data from the online consumer-to-consumer market in Japan. Results revealed a high propensity to trade the lean meat. Our results also showed that transactions of edible offal were significantly positive and relatively more common in wild boar and black bear. In the brown bear, the coefficient for the sales numbers of "hand and foot" was significantly positive. Findings indicate that the online consumer-to-consumer market can be a new opportunity to distribute WGM. The development of guidelines and regulatory systems could help to avoid the risks associated with WGM consumption.

Indexed as

CommerceConservation of Natural ResourcesMeatPublic HealthAnimalsAnimals, WildHumansInternetJapanSus scrofaUrsidaeConsumer preferenceHuman–wildlife conflictOne healthOnline auctionWild game meat

Identifiers

PMID40705235
PMCPMC12672966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.