ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2025
DNA damage induced by ZnO and CuO nanoparticles: a comparative study against bulk materials.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genotoxic and Physiological Responses to Repeated Exposure to Low-Concentration Silver Nanoparticles inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Genetic Stability and Photosystem II Functioning of In Vitro-RecoveredInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As nanoparticles are increasingly incorporated into consumer products and specialized areas, the need to study their toxicity and the importance of caution in their use are becoming more evident. The use of these novel materials in the automotive industry is causing increased nanoparticle emissions into the atmosphere, sparking concerns due to recent toxicology reports. Detecting and characterizing nanostructured atmospheric pollutants represent a complex task that alternative methods like genotoxic bioindicators may overcome. Ricinus communis was selected as a model plant to describe the genotoxic effect of air-dispersed nanostructured materials, using comet assay to evaluate the DNA damage by exposure to ZnO and CuO nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs, CuO-NPs), and total chlorophyll was determined to correlate the results. The plants were exposed for 1.25 h by nebulizing dispersions of the nanoparticles, and their effects were evaluated at 24 h and 5 days after exposure. Time was essential in demonstrating the DNA damage induced by lower levels of CuO-NPs and ZnO-NPs, which showed more significant damage after 5 days than bulk materials. In both compounds (CuO and ZnO), significant differences were observed in the comparison of their nanoscale and their bulk form, which confirms that the lower size of the nanoparticles presents a more significant genotoxic potential. In the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs, the accumulation of nanoparticles was observed near the stomata. The study demonstrated the viability of the comet assay as a sensitive tool both to assess DNA damage from ZnO-NPs and CuO-NPs on R. communis as a bioindicator and to investigate the potential risks of emerging nanomaterials, emphasizing the need for caution in their use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.