ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2025
Addressing fatty tissue in quantitative susceptibility mapping of human knee cartilage.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effects of excluding fatty tissue in QSM of human knee cartilage. MATERIALS AND
methodsGradient echo images from 18 knee-healthy volunteers were acquired, from which chemical shift corrected field perturbation maps were calculated. Based on these, QSM maps were reconstructed using morphology enabled dipole inversion and one of three masking alternatives: (1) excluding no tissue, (2) excluding bone marrow, and (3) excluding all fatty tissues. The slope of a linear regression [ppm/%] between susceptibility values and the relative distance from the bone surfaces was used as a measurement of contrast between cartilage layers. The average differences in slopes between methods are reported with 95% confidence intervals.
resultsThe expected susceptibility differences between cartilage layers from literature were observed for all tested reconstruction techniques. However, smaller slopes (average difference (confidence interval)) were detected when either all fatty tissue (- 0.090 (- 0.121, - 0.059) ppm/%) or bone marrow (- 0.088 (- 0.121, - 0.055) ppm/%) was excluded from reconstruction. DISCUSSION: All tested methods result in adequate image quality in QSM of knee cartilage. However, exclusion of fatty tissue decreased the susceptibility contrast between cartilage layers. Assuming that phase contributions from chemical shift are addressed, inclusion of fatty tissue may be preferable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.