Trial reportLasers in medical science2025
Photobiomodulation therapy in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced alopecia in breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05177289 (Evaluating the Feasibility and Efficacy of Photobiomodulation Therapy in the Prevention and Management of Chemotherapy-induced Alopecia), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluating the Feasibility and Efficacy of Photobiomodulation Therapy in the Prevention and Management of Chemotherapy-induced Alopecia: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeChemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) is a prominent side effect of chemotherapy, negatively impacting the patient's body image and self-confidence. Scalp cooling (SC) has emerged as a preventive option for CIA, but the success rate and adherence vary. Research shows that photobiomodulation (PBM) can improve hair growth by stimulating cell proliferation and repair processes. This trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of PBM combined with SC in preventing CIA.
methodsA randomized, controlled trial with 29 breast cancer patients undergoing taxane-based chemotherapy was performed at the Jessa Hospital (Belgium). Patients were randomized into the control (n = 16) or the intervention group (n = 13). Blinded researchers evaluated scalp coverage and hair thickness, while questionnaires were administered to assess scalp coverage, satisfaction, and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05177289, 4th of January 2022).
resultsThe scalp coverage and hair thickness did not differ significantly between the two groups. Patients in the PBM group scored higher on global health (P = 0.043), physical functioning (P = 0.039), role functioning (P = 0.049), and social functioning (P = 0.038). Patients receiving a paclitaxel-based chemotherapy showed less hair loss compared to patients undergoing a docetaxel-based regimen (Ps < 0.001). No differences in SC adherence could be observed between the two groups.
conclusionsThe addition of PBM to SC did not increase its efficacy in preventing hair loss during chemotherapy. Patients in the PBM group did score their HRQL higher compared to the control group. Further research is required to establish the use of PBM in CIA prevention and to corroborate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40705170What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.