Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40705169›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025

Flexible robotic platforms for surgical applications in microgravity environments: a comprehensive systematic review of minimally invasive mechatronic systems and the impact of artificial intelligence on behalf of the Center for Space Systems (C-SET) & TROGSS-The Robotic Global Surgical Society.

Christian A Macias, Aman Goyal, Mathew Mendoza, Shaun Manoj Mathew, Gabriela Rodriguez, John Camino, Patricio Duran, Jose Cornejo, Mariela Vargas, Jorge Cornejo and 8 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Christian A MaciasCenter for Space Systems (C-SET), Lima, Peru. christianmaciasmd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0481-8187
Aman GoyalTROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society, 45140, Saint Jean de la Ruelle, France.
Mathew MendozaTROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society, 45140, Saint Jean de la Ruelle, France.
Shaun Manoj MathewTROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society, 45140, Saint Jean de la Ruelle, France.
Gabriela RodriguezCenter for Space Systems (C-SET), Lima, Peru.
John CaminoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Santa Ines, Ambato, Ecuador.
Patricio DuranSchool of Medicine, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador.
Jose CornejoCenter for Space Systems (C-SET), Lima, Peru.
Mariela VargasCenter for Space Systems (C-SET), Lima, Peru.
Jorge CornejoDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Agustina PontecorvoDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Raul SebastianDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Rafael J GrossmannDepartment of Surgery, Portsmouth Regional Hospital, Portsmouth, NH, USA.
Ilaria CinelliAerospace Medical Association, 320 South Henry Street, Alexandria, VA, 22314-3579, USA.
Lisa BrownNew Zealand Space Health Research Network, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Adel Abou-MradTROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society, 45140, Saint Jean de la Ruelle, France.
Luigi MaranoTROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society, 45140, Saint Jean de la Ruelle, France.
Rodolfo J OviedoTROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society, 45140, Saint Jean de la Ruelle, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the 1990s marked a transformative shift in surgical practice, leveraging advanced robotic-assisted systems (RAS) for enhanced precision, dexterity, and improved patient outcomes. Over the past two decades, the surgical field has expanded from a handful of platforms to over 20 commercially available systems, some of them with artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities to varying degrees. While these advancements have redefined conventional surgical care, the unique challenges of space exploration, including microgravity, necessitate the adaptation of flexible robotic systems with AI. As the demand for long-duration space missions grows, addressing the surgical needs of astronauts becomes increasingly critical for human space exploration. A systematic review of the literature was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar. Search terms included "flexible robotic system," "endoscopic system," "robotic surgery in space," "microgravity environment," "artificial intelligence," and "space surgery." Studies were included based on their relevance to flexible robotic systems, microgravity surgical challenges, and the pathophysiology of space-induced conditions necessitating surgical interventions. Information on relevant space missions was sourced from the NASA databases. Of 69 studies reviewed, 21 MIS platforms were analyzed, with a focus on single-port and flexible robotic designs. Globally, RAS has revolutionized minimally invasive procedures, with over 12 million operations performed in 70 countries. Leading platforms, some of them with AI capabilities to assist with surgical decision-making, including da Vinci, and Hugo RAS, demonstrate potential for adaptation to microgravity. NASA's Integrated Medical Model (IMM) identifies 27 surgical conditions that may arise during space missions, emphasizing the need for compact, precise systems. Challenges, such as altered fluid dynamics, hemostasis, patient stabilization, and equipment ergonomics, are amplified in microgravity. Emerging innovations in actuators, sensors, and thermal management, alongside the compact and versatile designs of flexible robotic platforms with AI show significant promise in addressing these hurdles. Flexible robotic systems with AI offer transformative potential for surgical care in space, paving the way for safe and effective interventions in microgravity. Continued research, cross-disciplinary collaboration, and technological advancements are essential to overcome microgravity-specific challenges and ensure astronaut health during prolonged space exploration. This review underscores the necessity of adaptable robotic platforms with AI to support the future of space medicine.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresSpace FlightWeightlessnessHumansArtificial intelligenceFlexible robotic systemsMicrogravityMinimally invasive surgeryRobotic-assisted systemsSpace surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.