ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Towards a radiation-free clinical decision support system for intraoperative spinal alignment assessment.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper introduces SpineAlign, a novel radiation-free clinical decision support system (CDSS) designed to address the challenge of intraoperative spinal alignment assessment during spinal deformity (SD) correction surgeries. SpineAlign aims to overcome the current limitations of existing systems by providing a quantitative assessment without radiation exposure in the operating room (OR), thus enhancing the safety and precision of computer-assisted spinal surgeries (CASS). The system focuses on spinal alignment calculation, leveraging Bézier curves and algorithm development to track vertebrae and estimate spinal curvature. Collaborative meetings with clinical experts identified challenges such as patient positioning complexities and limitations of minimal invasiveness. Thus, the method developed involves four algorithms: (1) tracking anatomical planes; (2) estimating the Bézier curve; (3) determining vertebrae positions; and (4) adjusting orientation. A proof of concept (PoC) using a porcine spinal segment validated SpineAlign's integrated algorithms and functionalities. The PoC demonstrated the system's accuracy and clinical applicability, successfully transitioning a spine without curvature to a lordotic spine. Quantitative evaluation of spinal alignment by the system showed high accuracy, with a maximum root mean squared error of 6
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.