ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Serum GFAP predicts survival in advanced ALS: a prospective multicenter study.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A next-generation HDAC6 inhibitor for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeurofilament light chain (NfL) is a well-established biomarker of axonal damage in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), but its limited disease specificity warrants the identification of complementary markers. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) as adjunctive biomarkers to NfL in ALS.
methodsSerum NfL, GFAP, and BDNF levels were measured using ultrasensitive single-molecule array (SIMOA) assays in two independent ALS cohorts from Asan Medical Center (n = 65) and Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital (n = 53), along with 15 healthy controls. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Associations with clinical severity, disease progression rate, and survival were evaluated using correlation analyses, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and Cox proportional hazards models.
resultsSerum NfL, GFAP, and BDNF levels were significantly elevated in ALS versus controls, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.969, 0.613, and 0.875, for NfL, GFAP, and BDNF, respectively. NfL and GFAP levels increased with advancing King's stage (NfL: τ = 0.226, p = 0.011; GFAP: τ = 0.160, p = 0.023), though only NfL correlated with disease progression rate (r = 0.309, p = 0.001). Notably, elevated GFAP was independently associated with poorer survival in advanced ALS (King's stage 3-4), with a hazard ratio of 6.907 (95% CI: 1.978-24.119, p = 0.002).
conclusionsWhile NfL remains a robust marker of ALS progression, GFAP may serve as an independent prognostic marker in late-stage disease. Combining these markers may enhance prognostic accuracy and support personalized ALS care. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC: Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a widely accepted biomarker for axonal damage in ALS and correlates with disease progression. However, its lack of disease specificity limits its standalone prognostic value, necessitating the discovery of complementary biomarkers to improve prognostic accuracy. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This study demonstrates that while NfL remains a strong indicator of ALS progression, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) serves as an independent prognostic marker, particularly in advanced stages of the disease. Furthermore, it shows that serum BDNF levels are also elevated in ALS patients. HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY: Combining NfL and GFAP as a biomarker panel could significantly enhance prognostic accuracy and facilitate more personalized treatment strategies for ALS patients, especially in later disease stages. This could guide clinical trial design and improve patient stratification for therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40705135What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.