Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40705101›Full record

ArticleNeural computation2025

Fast Multigroup Gaussian Process Factor Models.

Evren Gokcen, Anna I Jasper, Adam Kohn, Christian K Machens, Byron M Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Evren GokcenDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA egokcen@cmu.edu.
Anna I JasperDominick Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA anna.jasper@einsteinmed.edu.
Adam KohnDominick Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, and Department of Systems and Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA adam.kohn@einsteinmed.edu.
Christian K MachensChampalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal christian.machens@neuro.fchampalimaud.org.
Byron M YuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA byronyu@cmu.edu.

Funding

Memory Formation in Motor CortexR01NS129584 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Aaron Paul Batista, Steven M Chase · 2022 to 2026
$2.8M
Understanding feedforward and feedback signaling between neuronal populationsRF1NS127107 · NINDS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI KOHN, ADAM, MACHENS, CHRISTIAN · 2022 to 2022
$2.0M
CRCNS: Dissecting Directed Interactions Amongst Multiple Neuronal PopulationsR01EY035896 · NEI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI ADAM KOHN, Byron M. Yu · 2023 to 2026
$1.3M
Understanding Feedforward and Feedback Signaling Between Neuronal PopulationsR01NS127107 · NINDS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ADAM KOHN, Byron M. Yu · 2025 to 2026
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY035896NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS127107NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS129584NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS127107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaussian processes are now commonly used in dimensionality reduction approaches tailored to neuroscience, especially to describe changes in high-dimensional neural activity over time. As recording capabilities expand to include neuronal populations across multiple brain areas, cortical layers, and cell types, interest in extending gaussian process factor models to characterize multipopulation interactions has grown. However, the cubic runtime scaling of current methods with the length of experimental trials and the number of recorded populations (groups) precludes their application to large-scale multipopulation recordings. Here, we improve this scaling from cubic to linear in both trial length and group number. We present two approximate approaches to fitting multigroup gaussian process factor models based on inducing variables and the frequency domain. Empirically, both methods achieved orders of magnitude speed-up with minimal impact on statistical performance, in simulation and on neural recordings of hundreds of neurons across three brain areas. The frequency domain approach, in particular, consistently provided the greatest runtime benefits with the fewest trade-offs in statistical performance. We further characterize the estimation biases introduced by the frequency domain approach and demonstrate effective strategies to mitigate them. This work enables a powerful class of analysis techniques to keep pace with the growing scale of multipopulation recordings, opening new avenues for exploring brain function.

Indexed as

BrainModels, NeurologicalNeuronsAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansNormal Distribution

Identifiers

PMID40705101
PMCPMC12313100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.