ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Decision-making algorithm for difficult intermittent self-catheterization: construction and validation using the Delphi method.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntermittent Self Catheterization (ISC) is the gold standard for chronic neurogenic and non neurogenic urinary retention. However, difficulties encountered may lead to poor adherence and discontinuation. This study aimed to develop and validate a decision-making algorithm to guide first and second line management of the more common difficulties reported by patients performing ISC.
methodsA survey conducted amongst patients, nurses and physicians identified the most frequent difficulties encountered with ISC. Based on a literature review and expert experience, a steering committee, composed of 14 urologists and physical medicine and rehabilitation practitioners, developed a preliminary algorithm outlining management strategies for each identified issues. The algorithm was then validated by a panel of experts through a Delphi process.
resultsSix difficulties were identified: pain, infections, bleeding, blockage, technical issues and neuro-psychological barriers. Twenty experts participated in the voting group. Of the 68 initial items, 61 were validated and included in the final algorithm (30 with a strong agreement, 31 with a relative agreement).
conclusionsThis multidisciplinary collaborative work resulted in a validated decision-making algorithm designed to complement to existing guidelines. It supports healthcare professionals from different backgrounds in managing patients who report difficulties with ISC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.