Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40704997›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Social rank-order stability of mice revealed by a novel food competition paradigm in combination with available space competition paradigms.

Meiqiu Liu, Yue Chen, Rongqing Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Complex social dominance behavior using a novel platform test is associated with lateral habenula activation in male and female mice.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meiqiu LiuGuangdong Province Key Laboratory of Psychiatric Disorders, Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-8934
Yue ChenGuangdong Province Key Laboratory of Psychiatric Disorders, Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6388-8489
Rongqing ChenThe National Key Clinic Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1668-8554

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31771127National Natural Science Foundation of China 82271859Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2023A1515010639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychological, behavioral, and biological studies on social organization and competition with animal models are boosting. The mouse has been recognized as a valuable and economic model animal for biomedical research in social behaviors; however, currently available food competition paradigms for mice remain limited. Discrepant paradigms involving different competitive factors, such as physical strength vs psychological features, muscular confrontation vs threat perception, and boldness vs timidity, may produce task-specific win-or-lose outcomes and lead to inconsistent ranking results. Here, we developed a food competition apparatus for mice, in which contenders were a pair of mice eager to take over the same food pellet placed under a movable block in the middle of a narrow chamber where they were separated to either the right or left side. This food pellet competition test (FPCT) was designed to (1) provide researchers with a choice of new food competition paradigm and (2) expose psychological factors influencing the establishment and/or expression of social status in mice by avoiding direct physical competition between contenders. Meanwhile, we wanted to evaluate the consistency of social ranking results between FPCT and typically available space competition paradigms-tube test and warm spot test (WST). We hypothesized inconsistency of rankings of mice tested by FPCT, tube test, and WST as they possess different targets for mice to compete and different factors determining competitiveness. Interestingly, application of FPCT in combination with tube test and WST discovered unexpected consistency of mouse social competitivity and rankings in a grouped male or female mice that were housed in either a two- or three-member cage, most likely indicating that the status sense of animals is part of a comprehensive identity of self-recognition of individuals in an established social colony. Furthermore, the FPCT may facilitate research on social organization and competition, given its reliability, validity, and ease of use.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalCompetitive BehaviorFeeding BehaviorSocial BehaviorAnimalsFemaleFoodMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLfood pellet competition testmouseneurosciencesocial competitionsocial hierarchytube test

Identifiers

PMID40704997
PMCPMC12289308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.