ArticleActa ophthalmologica2026
Tumour progression shows decrease in PD-L1 expression in matched metastases/primary uveal melanomas.
Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tumour progression shows decrease in PD-L1 expression in matched metastases/primary uveal melanomas.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionised the treatment of several malignancies. However, the results of ICI therapy remain unsatisfactory in metastatic uveal melanoma (UM). We analysed the expression of PD1, PD-L1, T-cell and macrophage markers in a set of matched primary and metastatic UM in an attempt to better understand the low effectiveness of ICI in metastatic UM.
methodsThirty-two samples (19 metastases and 13 primary UM) were stained for PD-L1, PD1, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD68, CD163, HLA class I and BAP1. T-cell markers were scored quantitatively, while PD-L1, CD68, CD163 and BAP1 were scored semiquantitatively. The immunohistochemical (IHC) scores were compared between all primary and metastatic UM samples and between matched cases.
resultsBoth the general and the matched analyses revealed that the IHC scores for PD-L1 expression on tumour cells were lower in metastatic UM than in primary UM. Conversely, T-cell markers, including PD1, were significantly higher in UM metastases than primary UM, while macrophages did not show a difference. Metastases with a low HLA Class I expression lacked PD-L1 and PD1 expression. BAP-1 loss was associated with increased lymphocytic infiltration.
conclusionsWhile UM metastases had higher lymphocytic infiltrates than primary UM, PD-L1 showed a lower expression in metastases. We believe that the low effectiveness of ICI in the treatment of metastatic UM may be partly explained by the low PD-L1 expression. We propose that primary tumours may be more responsive to ICI therapy than metastases and could be targeted in a (neo)adjuvant setting for patients at high risk of developing metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.