SynthesisThe Australasian journal of dermatology2025
Emerging Terbinafine Resistant Trichophyton Dermatophytosis, Testing Options and Alternative Treatments: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in The Australasian journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multifunctional Activity ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Detection of dermatophytes, Candida spp., and molds by the EuroArray Dermatomycosis® microarray versus fungal culture in patients with suspected dermatomycosis.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2026Article
- Global Emergence ofInfection and drug resistance · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dermatophytosis is a common superficial fungal infection of the skin, most often caused by dermatophytes from the Trichophyton genus. Terbinafine, which inhibits squalene epoxidase (SQLE), is widely used as first line treatment. However, resistance to terbinafine is increasing globally, including recent reports in Australia, with origins suspected to trace back to South Asia. Antifungal susceptibility testing is not routinely available in Australia, and globally, there are no standardised breakpoints for traditional culture-based methods. Although SQLE gene mutations have been associated with terbinafine resistance, a major research gap exists in the clinical interpretation of these mutations due to a lack of correlation between MIC values, genetic mutations and clinical treatment outcomes. This gap hampers the ability to guide clinical decision-making. Therefore, our objective was to assess the global prevalence of terbinafine-resistant Trichophyton infections, identify the most clinically relevant resistance testing methods, and determine effective alternative treatment options. The study was designed by systematic review. Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Cochrane's Trials database (CENTRAL), Global Health (CABI), Trials registries, along with Google Scholar and Web of Science (WoS) for the tracking of included articles. Published human studies in English from 2000 to 2023 of Terbinafine-resistant Trichophyton Dermatophytosis with confirmed antifungal susceptibility tests and genotyping of dermatophytes, as well as details of effective alternative treatments. Identified cases were independently screened by two authors on the basis of predetermined criteria. Thirty four studies reported 743 samples for which mutation data of the SQLE gene and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) were available. Twenty three studies reported on 149 patients who had used terbinafine with available MIC data. Of these, 94 cases demonstrated evidence of clinical resistance to terbinafine with confirmed SQLE genotyping and MIC data. Seven studies reported on 13 cases of clinical resistance to terbinafine with a reported MIC and a successful alternative therapy. There are no published MIC breakpoints for terbinafine resistance in antifungal resistance testing, creating significant challenges for clinical interpretation. This study suggests that an estimate of a provisional MIC threshold for resistance is calculated to be 1.69 μg/mL. Importantly, SQLE mutation data, particularly the presence of F397L, L393F and A448T shows a robust association with clinical resistance to terbinafine (odds ratio: 7.58; 14.0, 7.78, respectively). Routine SQLE mutation testing in cases of suspected terbinafine-resistant dermatophytosis could enhance diagnostic accuracy and inform more effective, timely treatment decisions. Identifying specific mutations may guide clinicians in selecting alternative antifungal agents earlier in the treatment course, reducing morbidity and improving outcomes. Systematic review was registered with PROSPERO. Trial Registration: PROSPERO number: CRD42022382880.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.