ArticleInternational journal of cancer2025
Early pembrolizumab clearance as prognostic biomarker for non-response in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Journey: From Early Promise to Lasting Impact.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2026Review
- Translational modelling challenges receptor‑occupancy‑based dosing of PD‑1 inhibitors like pembrolizumab.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Mendelian randomization analysis reveals causal associations between HLA gene expression, inflammatory biomarkers, and non-small cell lung cancer risk.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Exposure-response relationship of sintilimab in advanced gastric cancer: insights from time-dependent pharmacokinetics and biomarker integration for precision immunotherapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Early pembrolizumab clearance as prognostic biomarker for non-response in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved survival rates in patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer; however, the majority obtain no long-term benefits. We investigated pembrolizumab clearance as an early prognostic biomarker and evaluated its accuracy using a limited sampling strategy. Pembrolizumab clearance was calculated using non-linear mixed effects modeling, and cut points were determined using maximally selected rank statistics. The prognostic value for survival was estimated using univariate Cox regression analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated to evaluate the performance in identifying response (defined as disease control at 6 months). The accuracy of a limited sampling strategy was evaluated using MPE and NRSME. Among 303 patients included, 65% experienced disease progression, and 60% died. Patients with pembrolizumab clearance above 0.232 L/day at the first dose were more likely to have disease progression (HR = 1.98, 95% CI [1.21, 3.26], p = .007) or poor survival (HR = 2.04, 95% CI [1.16, 3.59], p = .014). A diminished decrease in clearance (<15.8%) at 6 weeks was also significantly associated with progression (HR = 1.46, 95% CI [1.12, 1.92], p = .006) and poor survival (HR = 1.82, 95% CI [1.35, 2.45], p = .000). Pembrolizumab clearance showed high sensitivity (0.96, 95% CI [0.92, 0.99]), but moderate positive predictive value (0.48). Limited sampling matched comprehensive sampling accuracy (MPE = +4.5% vs. +3.2%, NRSME = 16.8% vs. 14.2%). Early pembrolizumab clearance is a feasible prognostic biomarker for survival, with opportunities to enhance its positive predictive value before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.