ArticleOrthodontics & craniofacial research2025
Deep Learning Based Evaluation of Skeletal Maturation: A Comparative Analysis of Five Hand-Wrist Methods.
Article in Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for predicting the pubertal growth spurt using cephalometric and hand-wrist radiographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Classification Performance of General-Purpose Multimodal Large Language Models Across Orthodontic Radiographic Tasks: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Automated prediction of hand-wrist maturation stage from lateral cephalometric and panoramic radiographs using a deep learning approach.European journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
- Single-model deep learning approach for simultaneous cervical vertebral maturation staging and skeletal jaw relationship on lateral cephalograms using YOLOv8 and CNN.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Childhood Obesity and Craniofacial Growth: A Cross-Sectional Orthodontic Cephalometric Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Advanced deep learning techniques for classifying dental conditions using panoramic X-ray images.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- CBMNet: a dual-attention enhanced ConvNeXt model for accurate G.V. Black type I-III classification in intraoral periapical radiographs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning algorithms in skeletal age estimation by comparing the diagnostic reliability of five different hand-wrist maturation (HWM) assessment methods. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 6572 hand-wrist radiographs from orthodontic patients aged 8-16 years were retrospectively analysed. Radiographs were categorised into five groups based on HWM classification methods: (I) Björk's nine-stage, (II) Hägg and Taranger's five-stage, (III) Chapman's four-stage, (IV) three-stage hook of hamate ossification based and (V) simplified three-stage Björk's classification based. YOLOv8x-based deep learning models were trained separately for each group. The dataset was split into training, validation and test subsets. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score and AUC metrics.
resultsThe YOLOv8x-cls model demonstrated high classification performance across all five groups. Group IV and Group II achieved the highest accuracy and F1 scores, with average F1 values of 0.99 and 0.96, respectively. Group III and Group V also showed strong performance (F1 = 0.93 and 0.92). In Group I, slightly lower classification performance was observed in the S-H2 and MP3-Cap stages (F1 = 0.72-0.74), which correspond to the pubertal growth peak, while early and late skeletal maturation stages were classified with high accuracy and F1 scores. ROC curve analysis further supported these findings, with AUC values for MP3-Cap and S-H2 recorded as 0.70 and 0.75, respectively, whereas higher AUC values were achieved in most other stages across all groups.
conclusionDeep learning models proved effective in evaluating skeletal maturation across five different HWM methods. Particularly high performance was observed in anatomically distinct regions such as the MP3, adductor sesamoid and hamate bone, which can be reliably identified by general dentists, enabling earlier referrals and timely orthodontic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.