Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40704628›Full record

ReviewEcology letters2025

Continental Patterns of Phenotypic Variation Along Replicated Urban Gradients: A Mega-Analysis.

M J Thompson, J G A Martin, C Biard, J Bleu, C J Branston, P Capilla-Lasheras, N J Dingemanse, D M Dominoni, M Eens, T Eeva and 14 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

M J ThompsonDépartement des Sciences Biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0279-5340
J G A MartinDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
C BiardSorbonne Université, Université Paris Cité, Univ Paris Est Créteil, CNRS, IRD, INRAE, Institut d'écologie et des sciences de l'environnement de Paris, IEES, France.
J BleuUniversité de Strasbourg, CNRS, Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, IPHC UMR 7178, France.
C J BranstonSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
P Capilla-LasherasSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
N J DingemanseBehavioural Ecology, Faculty of Biology, LMU Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
D M DominoniSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
M EensDepartment of Biology, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
T EevaDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
K L EvansEcology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
C IsakssonDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
A LikerHUN-REN-PE Evolutionary Ecology Research Group, University of Pannonia, Hungary.
S MasseminUniversité de Strasbourg, CNRS, Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, IPHC UMR 7178, France.
E MatthysenDepartment of Biology, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
A MouchetBehavioural Ecology, Faculty of Biology, LMU Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5572-4688
S PerretCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
J C SenarDepartament of Evolutionary and Behavioural Ecology, Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona, Spain.
G SeressHUN-REN-PE Evolutionary Ecology Research Group, University of Pannonia, Hungary.
M SzulkinInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biology, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
E VinczeDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
H WatsonDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4656-0647
D RéaleDépartement des Sciences Biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
A CharmantierCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-19-CE34-0008-05Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-22-CE02-0004-01Centre Méditerranéen de l'Environnement et de la BiodiversitéCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueFonds de recherche du Québec Nature et TechnologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual variation among and within natural populations can have eco-evolutionary implications by, for example, affecting species interactions or evolutionary potential. Urban systems present a unique opportunity to evaluate how environmental change shapes variation since urban phenotypic differentiation is widely documented on contemporary timescales. We introduce and test three hypotheses to determine how urbanisation affects phenotypic variation at different population levels. Combining 21 long-term datasets in a mega-analysis approach, we synthesise how urbanisation impacts variation in tarsus length and lay date among and within subpopulations of great and blue tits (Parus major, Cyanistes caeruleus ) at a continental scale. Our synthesis reveals that urbanisation is associated with increased phenotypic variation within subpopulations by 11% on average, and by as much as 25% across the species and traits examined. We also find some evidence (for tarsus length in great tits) that urbanisation increases differentiation between subpopulations. We did not, however, find that urbanisation increases differences between subpopulations in their within-subpopulation variation. Our synthesis provides novel insights into how urban contexts impact individual diversity at different spatial scales and we highlight future directions that could establish the genetic and environmental effects that underlie these continental patterns of urban phenotypic variation.

Indexed as

Biological Variation, PopulationPasseriformesPhenotypeUrbanizationAnimalsblue titcityenvironmental heterogeneitygreat titindividual diversityintraspecific variationlay datesubpopulationtarsus lengthurbanisation

Identifiers

PMID40704628
PMCPMC12288444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.