ReviewCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Impact of Mechanistic Modeling and Simulation Methodologies on Product-Specific Guidance Development for Non-Orally Administered Drug Products.
Review in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) publishes product-specific guidances (PSGs), with bioequivalence (BE) recommendations for prospective generics. Developing BE recommendations for non-orally administered drug products including long-acting injectables (LAI), orally inhaled drug products, and drugs applied locally to the skin, ophthalmic, and nasal routes may be challenging because conventional BE methods and considerations for orally administered drug products may not apply. Mechanistic modeling approaches such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models or computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models are used for the development of BE methods and BE assessment standards in PSGs for non-orally administered drug products, as evidenced by cases provided here. This manuscript discusses in silico methodologies that support PSG development for non-orally administered drug products through the model-integrated evidence paradigm. Specifically for orally inhaled drug products, we highlight modeling and simulation (M&S) recommendations that have occurred in one new PSG that was published for formoterol fumarate; glycopyrrolate inhalation metered aerosol in February 2024 and referred to in 16 other PSGs with different active pharmaceutical ingredients and device types, such that M&S approaches may be optionally used to provide insight on regional drug delivery and support BE assessments. For drug products applied to the skin, we focus on three successful case studies where PBPK models were used to support revised PSG recommendations with reduced need for ex vivo and human studies. Ophthalmic products, LAI, and nasal products illustrated advancements in M&S methodologies that may be potentially used for the development of new or revised PSG recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.