Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40704365›Full record

ReviewStructural heart : the journal of the Heart Team2025

Staging Aortic Stenosis Based on Cardiac Damage: A New Tool for Risk Prediction, Clinical Decision-Making, and Trial Design.

Linda D Gillam, Philippe Généreux

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Linda D GillamDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, New Jersey, USA.
Philippe GénéreuxDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staging based on extra-valvular cardiac damage is an intuitive approach to categorizing patients with aortic stenosis (AS) that is easily applied using widely available echocardiographic tools. As discussed in this review, it has been shown to be a powerful tool for risk stratification that complements conventional approaches. The original and most widely used framework identifies stage 0 when there is AS without additional cardiac damage; stage 1 when there is left ventricular damage (hypertrophy, systolic or diastolic dysfunction with evidence of elevated filling pressures); stage 2 when there is mitral dysfunction (moderate or greater mitral regurgitation, typically secondary) or left atrial abnormalities (left atrial enlargement or atrial fibrillation); stage 3 when there is pulmonary hypertension and/or moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation (typically secondary); and stage 4 when there is moderate or greater right ventricular dysfunction. In a series of studies that have collectively evaluated damage before and after aortic valve replacement in patients with moderate and severe AS, as well as with and without symptoms, cardiac damage has been shown to predict all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and other outcomes. These observations support the design of trials to reevaluate thresholds for aortic valve replacement in AS and approaches that consider cardiac damage stage in clinical decision-making for individual patients (valve replacement vs. medical therapy).

Indexed as

Aortic stenosisAortic valve replacementCardiac damageMortalityQuality of lifeRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID40704365
PMCPMC12281282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.