ArticleTanaffos2024
Potential Laboratory Markers in COVID-19 Patients with Gastrointestinal Impairments as Prognosticators of the Disease Severity.
Article in Tanaffos, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The new coronavirus infectious disease, COVID-19, is constantly killing people around the world. The main clinical symptoms of COVID-19 include fever, cough, shortness of breath, weakness, fatigue, and sputum/discharge. Gastrointestinal (GI) impairments are often associated with respiratory manifestations in COVID-19 patients. The current study aimed to examine potential laboratory markers in COVID-19 patients with gastrointestinal impairments as prognosticators of disease severity. Materials and Methods: In the present study, hospitalized COVID-19 patients with respiratory symptoms as the main clinical manifestations and gastrointestinal symptoms were studied to evaluate relevant blood biomarkers including vitamins B12, D, and K in addition to albumin, pre-albumin, calcium, and magnesium. Results: Sixty individuals (29 males and 31 females) participated in the study aged between 29 and 72 years, with a mean of 45.87 years. Our results showed a significant increase in albumin, pre-albumin, transferrin, and vitamin K and a significant decrease in magnesium and vitamin B12. Decreases in calcium and vitamin D were modestly associated with the clinical picture of the patient group. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that monitoring laboratory markers such as transferrin, serum albumin, vitamin K, and magnesium-to-calcium ratio could be valuable prognosticators for COVID-19 infection. They could assist in better patient management and disease control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40704341PMC12281346What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.