Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40704315›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Construction and evaluation of a machine learning-based predictive model for enteral nutrition feeding intolerance risk in ICU patients.

Gaimei Wang, Cendi Lu, Owusu Mensah Solomon, Yujia Gu, Yijing Ling, Fanchi Xu, Yumin Tao, Yehong Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Artificial intelligence-guided nutritional therapy in the ICU.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gaimei Wang *Department of Neurosurgery Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Cendi Lu *Department of Neurosurgery Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Owusu Mensah SolomonInternational Education College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Yujia GuCollege of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Yijing LingCollege of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Fanchi XuCollege of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Yumin TaoNingbo Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ningbo, China.
Yehong WeiIntensive Care Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We aim to investigate the factors influencing enteral nutrition feeding intolerance (ENFI) in critically ill patients and develop a risk prediction model for ENFI in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, utilizing three machine learning algorithms. This model will serve as an assessment tool for preventing and managing ENFI in ICU patients. Methods: A total of 487 ICU patients from a tertiary hospital in Zhejiang Province between January 2021 and December 2023 were selected as the study subjects. The patients were randomly divided into a training set and a test set in an 8:2 ratio. Three machine learning algorithms-logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF)-were used to construct the risk prediction model for ENFI in ICU patients. The predictive performance of the three models was compared using metrics such as AUC (area under the ROC curve), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Results: The logistic regression model achieved an AUC of 0.9308, with an accuracy of 94.3%, precision of 95.4%, recall of 88.6%, and an F1-score of 0.9185 in correctly identifying ENFI risk in ICU patients. The random forest model attained an AUC of 0.9511, with an accuracy of 96.1%, precision of 97.7%, recall of 91.4%, and an F1-score of 0.9446. The support vector machine (SVM) model yielded an AUC of 0.9241, with an accuracy of 94.1%, precision of 96.8%, recall of 86.4%, and an F1-score of 0.9132. Conclusion: The random forest model performed the best in this study, demonstrating superior predictive performance.

Indexed as

enteral nutritionfeeding intoleranceICU patientsmachine learningprediction model

Identifiers

PMID40704315
PMCPMC12283280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.