ArticleCancer management and research2025
Predictive Value of Tumor ERCC1 Expression for Treatment Outcomes After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Completely Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the predictive value of tumor expression of the excision repair cross-complementation group 1 gene (ERCC1) for the treatment outcomes after platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: In this study, we conducted immunohistochemical analysis using a mouse monoclonal anti-ERCC1 antibody (clone 8F1) of operative specimens obtained from 238 patients enrolled in the SLCG0401 study which compared paclitaxel plus carboplatin (CBDCA+PTX) with uracil-tegafur (UFT) as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB-IIIA NSCLC. The overall survival (OS) of the patients was compared according to the ERCC1 expression status and adjuvant chemotherapy employed. Results: Of the 238 specimens, 102 (42.9%) showed a positive result for ERCC1 expression. There were no significant differences in the patient characteristics or OS between the tumor ERCC1-positive and -negative patient groups. Among the patients with ERCC1-negative tumors, there was no significant difference in the survival between patient groups treated with CBDCA+PTX and UFT (HR=0.932, 95% CI: 0.52-1.67, p=0.814). However, among the patients with ERCC1-positive tumors, CBDCA+PTX treatment tended to yield an inferior outcome, in terms of the OS, as compared with UFT treatment (HR=1.852, 95% CI: 0.92-3.73, p=0.080). Multivariate analysis showed that ERCC1 expression was not an independent predictor of the OS following CBDCA+PTX treatment in completely resected NSCLC patients. Conclusion: In completely resected NSCLC patients with positive tumor ERCC1 expression, adjuvant CBDCA+PTX treatment tended to yield an inferior outcome as compared with UFT treatment in terms of the OS. However, immunohistochemical analysis with the 8F1 antibody cannot be used for clinical decision making at this point.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.