Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40704278›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

In Vitro Evaluation of the Efficacy of 27 French Over-the-Counter Anti-lice Treatments.

Berthine Toubate, Aniss Louchez, Françoise Debierre, Thomas Morgenroth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Berthine ToubateInfectiologie et Santé Publique (ISP), Université de Tours, Tours, FRA.
Aniss LouchezPharmacy, Université de Lille, Lille, FRA.
Françoise DebierreInfectiologie et Santé Publique (ISP), Université de Tours, Tours, FRA.
Thomas MorgenrothPharmacy, Université de Lille, Lille, FRA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head lice remain a major public health problem worldwide, with a high prevalence among schoolchildren. Many lice treatments are available, but their efficacy is often poorly evaluated. An increase in the resistance of parasites to neurotoxic therapies, combined with a partial efficacy of certain suffocating agents, can contribute to the maintenance or even rise in infestations. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of 27 different over-the-counter lice treatments available in France in 2024 for eliminating lice and nits. To do this, we used the subspecies Pediculus humanus humanus, a well-established model organism for competitive studies. The products were purchased in France from randomly selected pharmacies and then tested in the laboratory on lice and their eggs. The laboratory conditions of the in vitro tests were designed to reproduce the exposure times and application methods recommended by the manufacturers. A parallel study was carried out on sales data for anti-lice products from French pharmacies. The results allowed the classification of the 27 products into four groups: five products demonstrated potentially 100% pediculicidal and ovicidal activity; four products showed potentially 100% pediculicidal activity but insufficient ovicidal activity; another four products exhibited potentially 100% ovicidal activity but insufficient pediculicidal activity; and the remaining 14 products showed insufficient activity against both lice and nits. Sales data show that only 27% of products sold in French pharmacies are able to completely cure pediculosis. The French market for lice products is mainly occupied by treatments with a lack of effectiveness. Health authorities should require thorough efficacy assessments before registration and conduct periodic reviews to ensure the effectiveness of these treatments sold in pharmacies.

Indexed as

clinical effectivenessfrancein vitro studiespediculosis capitispediculosis humanus humanus

Identifiers

PMID40704278
PMCPMC12285546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.