Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40704174›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Enhanced SqueezeNet model for detecting IoT-Bot attacks: A comprehensive approach.

Balaganesh Bojarajulu, Sarvesh Tanwar, Thipendra Pal Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Balaganesh BojarajuluAmity Institute of Information Technology, Amity University, Noida, India.
Sarvesh TanwarAmity Institute of Information Technology, Amity University, Noida, India.
Thipendra Pal SinghChandigarh University, Unnao, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exponential growth of Internet of Things (abbreviated as IoT) has led to a surge in cyber threats, especially botnet attacks that compromise network security. Although machine learning (abbreviated ML) & deep learning (abbreviated as DL) approaches have shown promise in detecting these attacks, they often struggle with limited accuracy & high computational requirements, making them unsuitable for real-time detection in resource-constrained IoT environments. To overcome these limitations, this research proposes an enhanced detection framework based on an improved SqueezeNet model integrated with a Deep Convolutional Neural Network (abbreviated as DCNN) and an optimized stochastic mixed Lp layer. This model aims to improve detection accuracy while maintaining computational efficiency. Experimental evaluation using a large-scale intrusion detection dataset demonstrates that the proposed model significantly outperforms existing techniques such as Bi-GRU, CNN, PolyNet, and LinkNet, achieving a classification accuracy of 0.97 and a reduced false positive rate of 0.054. The complete research process is outlined below:•Data Pre-processing: Min-max normalization is applied to the input dataset to ensure consistent data scaling and enhance model learning performance.•Feature Extraction and Classification: The improved SqueezeNet is integrated with DCNN & a stochastic mixed Lp layer to extract meaningful features and classify attacks accurately.•Model Evaluation: Performance is validated through accuracy, precision, recall, and false positive rate using a benchmark intrusion detection dataset.

Indexed as

Botnet attacksDeep learningImproved Squeeze netIoTMin-max normalization

Identifiers

PMID40704174
PMCPMC12284568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.