Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40704157›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025

Trends in Observation Care and the Growth of Dedicated Emergency Department Observation Units: An Analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2007-2022.

Shih-Chuan Chou, Andrew D Luo, Andy H Lee, David A Meguerdichian, Christopher W Baugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Condition-Specific Protocols Used in the Emergency Department Observation Unit: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shih-Chuan ChouDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.
Andrew D LuoHarvard-Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Andy H LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
David A MeguerdichianDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Christopher W BaughDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: We examined changes in observation care from 2007 to 2022 and compared emergency departments (EDs) with ED observation units (EDOUs) to EDs with other observation care settings. Methods: We analyzed 2007-2022 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data. We examined the proportion of ED visits resulting in hospitalizations (both inpatient and observation admits) and observation stays. We also examined the proportion of EDs reporting the presence of EDOUs and observation units outside the ED (hospital observation units or HOUs). Lastly, we compared patient populations across observation care settings. Results: From 2007 to 2022, the overall hospitalization rates among sampled ED visits were 14.5% (95% CI, 13.6-15.7) in 2007-2008 and 13.8% (95% CI, 12.9-15.8) in 2021-2022. Observation rates were 2.0% (95% CI, 1.6-2.4) to 2.4% (95% CI, 1.8-3.2) over the same periods (annual trend Conclusion: From 2007 to 2022, there was a modest increase in observation care utilization but a substantial increase in the presence of EDOUs across US EDs. EDOUs also have a lower rate of subsequent inpatient admission. Future research should include observation stays when examining hospital care utilization and seeking to distinguish EDOU from other forms of observation care.

Identifiers

PMID40704157
PMCPMC12281316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.