ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2025
Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Indicator in Advanced Gastric Cancer Undergoing Radical Gastrectomy.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Development and validation of a prognostic nutritional-inflammatory-immune score and web-based dynamic nomogram for gastric cancer following radical gastrectomy: a multicenter study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Postoperative Neutrophil-to-Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Marker for Patients with Bladder Cancer Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Neutrophil-albumin ratio and multi-phase computed tomography for lymph node metastasis in pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the preoperative neutrophil-to-albumin ratio (NAR) in patients with advanced gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted involving 526 patients diagnosed with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent radical gastrectomy between January 2017 and December 2019. Preoperative NAR values were calculated using neutrophil count and serum albumin levels obtained within 24 hours of admission. Patients were stratified into high-NAR and low-NAR groups using an optimal cut-off value determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves, univariate, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Results: The optimal NAR cut-off value was identified as 2.8. Patients with high NAR exhibited significantly worse overall survival and recurrence-free survival compared to the low-NAR group. High NAR was significantly associated with advanced tumor stage, incomplete resection status, administration of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and poor histological differentiation (all P < 0.0001). Multivariate analyses confirmed NAR as an independent prognostic factor for both overall survival (HR=2.67; 95% CI, 1.97-4.25; p = 0.002) and recurrence-free survival (HR=3.51; 95% CI, 1.58-5.26; p = 0.003). Conclusion: The preoperative neutrophil-to-albumin ratio is an independent and reliable prognostic biomarker for overall and recurrence-free survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy. Due to its accessibility, simplicity, and predictive value, the neutrophil-to-albumin ratio can effectively facilitate risk stratification, personalized clinical decision-making, and targeted interventions to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.