Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40704076›Full record

ArticleEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.)2025

The Intrinsic Link between Optical Properties and Toxicity of Extractable Organic Matter in Combustion Particles: Mediated by Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds.

Chuxin Yao, Jiao Tang, Guangcai Zhong, Huimin Ma, Yangzhi Mo, Xiaofei Geng, Xin Yi, Qianyu Zhang, Jun Li, Shizhen Zhao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environment & health (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chuxin YaoState Key Laboratory of Advanced Environmental Technology, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8688-9593
Jiao TangState Key Laboratory of Advanced Environmental Technology, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5485-8174
Guangcai ZhongState Key Laboratory of Advanced Environmental Technology, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5647-5940
Huimin MaState Key Laboratory of Advanced Environmental Technology, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-6381
Yangzhi MoState Key Laboratory of Advanced Environmental Technology, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Xiaofei GengState Key Laboratory of Advanced Environmental Technology, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Xin YiState Key Laboratory of Advanced Environmental Technology, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Qianyu ZhangState Key Laboratory of Advanced Environmental Technology, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1065-1109
Jun LiState Key Laboratory of Advanced Environmental Technology, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3637-1642
Shizhen ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Advanced Environmental Technology, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1534-9283
Gan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Advanced Environmental Technology, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9010-8140

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organic compounds are important contributors to the optical properties and health effects of combustion-derived particles. However, the connection between optical properties and toxicity of combustion particles remains a matter of little concern. In this study, combustion particles were collected from 11 primary sources, including biomass burning, coal combustion, and vehicle exhaust. The extractable organic matter (EOM) in bituminous coal combustion particles shows the highest light-absorption, fluorescence properties, and toxicity among samples. Parallel factor (PARAFAC) analysis combined excitation-emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy resolved 4 types of basic chromophore components in EOM. Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) analysis further resolved ∼800 molecules, predominantly aromatics (84% ± 4.6%), which showed positive correlations with the light-absorption, fluorescence properties and toxicity of EOM (

Indexed as

AromaticsBPCAsCombustion particlesFT-ICR MSOptical propertiesToxicity

Identifiers

PMID40704076
PMCPMC12281203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.