Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40704066›Full record

ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2025

Healthcare Costs and Treatment Patterns of Triplet Therapies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Real World Evidence from Italy.

Valentina Perrone, Melania Leogrande, Elisa Giacomini, Maria Cappuccilli, Luca Degli Esposti, LHU study group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valentina PerroneCliCon S.R.L. Società Benefit, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bologna, Italy.
Melania LeograndeCliCon S.R.L. Società Benefit, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-2092-4638
Elisa GiacominiCliCon S.R.L. Società Benefit, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bologna, Italy.
Maria CappuccilliCliCon S.R.L. Società Benefit, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2592-9532
Luca Degli EspostiCliCon S.R.L. Società Benefit, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7020-6659
LHU study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This analysis sought to characterize patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) on triplet therapy with immunomodulatory agents/proteasome inhibitors/monoclonal antibodies combined with dexamethasone, describing their demographic and clinical features, therapeutic pathways and the related healthcare costs for the Italian National Health Service (NHS). Patients and Methods: A retrospective observational analysis was conducted on administrative databases of Italian healthcare entities, covering about 3.6 million health-assisted residents. From 2017 to 2020, patients receiving at least one triplet combination reimbursed by the Italian NHS for the treatment of RRMM were included. RRMM treatment pathways were evaluated in terms of duration of therapy and treatment lines. Healthcare costs per patient were assessed on monthly basis during the therapy period by computing expenditures for drugs, hospitalizations and outpatient specialist services. Results: A total of 209 RRMM patients on triplet combinations were identified, with a mean age of 67.4 years, 56% males and mild-to-moderate comorbidity profile, with heart disease and renal disease as the most common coexisting conditions (respectively, 13.4% and 7.7% of patients). KRd (carfilzomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone) was the triplet administrated to the largest proportion of patients (44%), then DaraRd (daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone) triplet (24%). Treatment duration was on average 7 months for overall patients, 7.7 months for 118 patients with triplet as second line at inclusion, and 6 months for 91 patients with triplet as third or further line at inclusion. The monthly overall costs were € 9,517, with drug expenses accounting for 93% of total expenditures. Progressing to later treatment lines, cost analysis showed comparable trends, being drugs as the most impactive item. Conclusion: This analysis on RRMM patients under triplet medication in real-life Italian clinical practice confirmed the complex multifaceted profile of this frail population, highlighting a challenging clinical management for the oncologists and a major economic burden for the NHS.

Indexed as

cost analysisduration of therapyimmunomodulatory agentsmonoclonal antibodiesproteasome inhibitorstreatment linestriplet combination therapy

Identifiers

PMID40704066
PMCPMC12285882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.