ArticleThe journal of liquid biopsy2025
Fragmentomic-based algorithm to computationally predict tumor-somatic, germline, and clonal hematopoiesis variant origin in liquid biopsy.
Article in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinct mutational landscapes for germline and somatic cancer variants in forty tumor suppressor genes.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Interference of clonal hematopoiesis in cfDNA liquid biopsy testing and identification of actionable alterations in large diverse cohort of US veterans.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Harmonizing definitions in liquid biopsy: A terminology framework by the international society of liquid biopsy.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Review
- Liquid biopsy in the clinical management of tumor of urinary system: current status and future developments.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Review
- Distinct mutational landscapes when comparing germline and somatic cancer variants in forty tumor suppressor genes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Circulating tumor DNA-guided early detection and minimal residual disease monitoring in pancreatic and biliary cancers: evidence, barriers, and opportunities.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Genomic profiling of tumors by liquid biopsy (LBx) is a pragmatic alternative to profiling tissue. Despite recent methodologic advances, clonal hematopoiesis (CH) variants arising from hematopoietic stem cells may confound LBx results. Distinguishing the origin of variants detected by LBx will greatly enhance treatment decision-making for patients with cancer. Experimental design: We sequenced DNA isolated from paired plasma and white blood cells (WBC) at equal depth to train (n = 1977) and validate (n = 658) Variant Origin Prediction (VOP), a machine learning algorithm that leverages fragmentomics to generate probabilities that a short variant (SV) detected by LBx is tumor-somatic, germline, or CH in origin. The algorithm's classifications were validated for accuracy using paired WBC DNA and for reproducibility using LBx replicates. Results: We show that 68% of LBx detected at least one reportable variant of CH origin. Our fragmentomic-based algorithm differentiated reportable tumor and CH variants with high sensitivity, high positive predictive value (PPA >93%, PPV >91%), and high reproducibility (>94%). Critically, VOP performs well for SVs with VAFs ≤1% (PPV >90%), as well as in genes known to harbor both CH and tumor-somatic SVs, such as Conclusions: VOP is a highly accurate and reproducible method to predict the origin of SVs detected in LBx without reliance on WBC sequencing. VOP can reduce inappropriate use of targeted therapies and their toxicities for patients with variants of CH origin and enables accurate tumor profiling and monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.