ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Physician-assisted suicide in Italy: where do we stand and where do we want to go?
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) remains a subject of global debate and ethical controversy, alongside other end-of-life issues such as euthanasia, palliative care, access to health and social care services, and, importantly, patient autonomy. Within this context, PAS is defined as the practice in which a physician, at the explicit request of a competent patient, prescribes a lethal medication that the patient may self-administer to end their own life. This definition clearly distinguishes PAS from euthanasia, wherein the physician directly administers the life-ending drug. Despite ongoing efforts to establish a unified definition, significant variability remains across jurisdictions with regard to eligibility criteria, procedural safeguards, and the overarching legal and ethical frameworks governing PAS. In Italy, there is currently no effective legislation regulating euthanasia or PAS, which remain practices punishable under Articles 579 (homicide of a consenting person) and 580 (instigation or assistance in suicide) of the Italian Criminal Code. The Tuscany Region has prepared a regulatory attempt at the regional level, which has, however, limited itself to proposing an operational protocol that distinguishes the operational responsibilities that the PAS procedure applicant will face. However, following several relevant cases that profoundly influenced the Italian debate, significant attention has been directed toward end-of-life issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.