ArticleJournal of physics D: Applied physics2025
Effects of excitation field amplitude on magnetic particle imaging performance: a modeling study.
Article in Journal of physics D: Applied physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) is a new tomographic imaging technique that can quantitatively correlate MPI signal intensity to the spatial distribution of magnetic nanoparticle (MNP) tracers. Due to its non-ionizing nature, low background signal from biological matrices, high contrast, and relatively good spatial and temporal resolution, MPI has been actively studied and applied to biomedical imaging and is expected to reach the clinical stage soon. To further improve the spatial resolution limit in MPI, researchers have been working towards optimizing the image reconstruction algorithms, magnetic field profiles, tracer designs, circuitry, etc. Recent studies reported that lower excitation field amplitudes can improve spatial resolution, though this comes at the expense of lower MPI signal and tracer sensitivity. Different excitation field profiles directly affect the collective dynamic magnetizations of tracers recorded by the receiver coil in MPI. However, there is a gap between understanding the relaxation dynamics of MNP tracers, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of MPI signals, and the MPI spatial resolution. In this work, we used a stochastic Langevin equation with coupled Brownian and Néel relaxations to model the magnetic dynamics of different MNP tracers subjected to varying excitation fields. We analyzed the collective time-domain dynamic magnetizations (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.