ArticleNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
Perception of Autopsy among Selected Healthcare Workers at a Tertiary Hospital in Freetown, Sierra Leone- A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Autopsy is a specialized surgical procedure that thoroughly examines a dead body to determine the cause and manner of death and assess any pre-existing conditions. Studies show its practice has significantly declined in recent years. In Sierra Leone, some deaths are attributed to traditional and religious beliefs due to the lack of scientific explanations. Even within the medical community, many deaths remain undiagnosed despite advanced diagnostic tools like CT scans and MRIs. Clinicians often overlook autopsy as a tool for solving such mysteries. This study aimed to evaluate the perception of autopsy among doctors and nurses at a tertiary hospital in Freetown, Sierra Leone. Methodology: A cross-sectional study design enrolled 215 doctors and nurses using probability proportionate to size, followed by random sampling. Data was collected through a semi-structured questionnaire, and SPSS Version 26.0 was used for analysis. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square, and logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: The mean age of participants was 32.8 ±7.42 years. Nurses accounted for 73.5% of the study participants. 48.4% and 38.1% of the participants had fair and good knowledge regarding autopsy respectively, and 81.9% displayed a positive attitude. However, only 53.5% had a positive perception, with doctors showing a higher proportion. Only 36.7% were open to organ donation, and most (71.6%) were unaware of policies guiding autopsy practice at the study site. Profession did not predict participant's knowledge (p-value > 0.05); but it significantly predicted their perception, with doctors 4.62 times more likely to have a positive perception (AOR= 4.62, p value< 0.001). The T-test analysis showed that doctors showed higher knowledge and perception than nurses. Conclusion: Although many participants had fair to good knowledge and a positive attitude, more awareness is still needed about the medical benefits of autopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.