ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Low-velocity ballistic tibia fractures are predisposed to complications and experience more unplanned reoperations.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ballistic trauma frequently results in tibia fractures. Despite the frequency of these injuries, there remains an incomplete characterization of ballistic fractures and their outcomes. The primary purpose of this study was to compare unplanned reoperation and fracture-related complication rates between blunt and ballistic tibia fractures. Methods: This was a retrospective case control study. Patients from a single urban level 1 trauma center with low velocity ballistic injuries of the tibial shaft and distal tibia (AO/OTA 42 and 43) were identified and compared to a control cohort with closed blunt fractures. The primary outcome measures were unplanned reoperation rates and fracture-related complications. Results: Seventy-four patients met inclusion criteria and were compared to 74 patients in the control group. Twentyfive (33.7 %) patients in the study cohort required an unplanned reoperation versus 11 (14.9 %) in the control group (p = 0.013). Five (6.7 %) patients in the study cohort required soft tissue reconstruction to obtain coverage; deep infection developed in 13 (17.6 %) of the ballistic fractures versus none in the control group (p < 0.001). Eighteen (24.3 %) ballistic fractures went on to develop a nonunion versus just one (1.4 %) control (p=<0.001). Ballistic distal tibia fractures (AO/OTA 43) had higher rates of deep infection (36.4 % vs 9.6 %, p = 0.015) and unplanned reoperation (54.5 % vs 25 %, p = 0.018) compared to ballistic diaphyseal (AO/OTA 42) fracture patterns; with the numbers available for study, there was a similar rate of nonunion (36.4 % vs 19.2 %, p = 0.143). Conclusion: This study suggests that low velocity ballistic tibia fractures have a higher incidence of unplanned reoperation and fracture-related complications than previously reported; more distal fracture location was associated with deep infection and unplanned reoperation. Surgeons managing ballistic fractures of the tibia should be cognizant of these differences and factor them into their clinical decision making, especially when managing fractures of the distal tibia or plafond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.