ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Natural language processing algorithms identify wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase gliomas in electronic health records.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: In 2021, the World Health Organization reclassified glioblastomas to include only gliomas with wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDHwt). Reclassification has created a challenge for retrospective identification of patients with GBM, as many were classified with outdated definitions. This study aims to address this challenge by using natural language processing (NLP) on electronic health record (EHR) data to identify patients with wild-type IDH glioma. Methods: We manually adjudicated a subset of 1499 pathology records for evidence of IDHwt glioma as well as the methylation status of the MGMT promoter. We then trained several regularized logistic regression models that identify the IDH mutation and MGMT promoter status using biomedical concepts identified in the text. These models were then validated at a second site. Kaplan-Meier curves stratifying patients by their MGMT promoter methylation status and other clinical variables were constructed for further cohort characterization. Results: The best-performing model for identifying IDHwt glioma displayed an F1 measure of 0.88. Comparing patients with methylated and unmethylated MGMT promoter showed significant differences in median overall survival times ( Discussion: Our results suggest that we can identify patients with IDHwt glioma in pathology notes in the EHR using NLP. Our models displayed excellent performance at a secondary healthcare institution, demonstrating that they can identify multi-site GBM cohorts. Furthermore, our characterization of the NM GBM cohort recapitulated known survival trends, demonstrating the utility of EHR data in studying GBM in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.