Trial reportClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Rotational Stability After Implantation of an Aspheric Toric Monofocal IOL with a Double C-Loop Haptic Design in Normal and High Axial Lengths.
Trial report in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photic Phenomena and Quality of Vision Following Aspheric Toric Monofocal IOL with a Double C-Loop Haptic Design Implantation.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Trial
- Clinical Outcomes of Double C-Loop Haptic Intraocular Lenses Across Different Optic Designs: A Retrospective Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Clinical Performance of an Isofocal Toric Intraocular Lens with Double C-Loop Haptics: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Effect of Anesthesia Technique on the Postoperative Rotational Stability of Toric Intraocular Lenses.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study focuses on the analysis of the rotational stability after implantation of a biconvex aspheric toric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) with a double C-loop haptic-design in eyes with normal versus high axial lengths. Methods: This was a prospective comparative study including 150 eyes with corneal astigmatism (≥0.75D) implanted with the biconvex aspheric monofocal PODEYE toric IOL and assessed up to 1 year after surgery. From these 150 eyes, 81 and 69 eyes belonged to normal (≤23.9mm) and high (≥24mm) axial lengths, respectively. About 4-6 and 11-13 months postoperatively, refraction and rotational stability of the PODEYE toric IOL were evaluated to find possible differences among both groups. Results: At the last postoperative-visit, 74.07% of eyes were within ±0.50D and 95.06% of eyes were within ±1.00D of the target-refraction for the normal group and 92.75% and 100% for the high axial length group, respectively. For the normal group, 77.78% and 96.30% of eyes had a postoperative refractive cylinder of ≤0.50D and ≤1.00D, respectively; and for the high axial length group these percentages were 84.05% and 100%, respectively. About 81.84% of eyes in the normal and 94.20% of eyes in the high axial length group were <5 degrees of the intended axis. The mean IOL rotation was 2.93 ± 2.48 degrees in the normal axial length group, and 2.17 ± 1.73 degrees in the high axial length group. Based on the mixed ANOVA results, there is no evidence of a significant difference in IOL rotation over time, nor is there evidence that axial length plays a statistically significant role in rotational stability between 4-6 and 11-13 months postsurgery. Both groups exhibited similar and stable rotation outcomes. Conclusion: Our results reveal that the biconvex aspheric monofocal PODEYE toric IOL with double C-loop haptic-design shows excellent rotational stability without significant differences between eyes with normal and high axial lengths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.