Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40703658›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025

Integrative multi-omics analysis and experimental validation identify molecular subtypes, prognostic signature, and CA9 as a therapeutic target in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Yun Zhao, Jing Yang, Yamei Jiang, Jingbiao Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yun Zhao *Department of Stomatology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Jing Yang *Demonstration Center for Experimental Teaching in Biomedicine, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China.
Yamei JiangDepartment of Stomatology, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Jingbiao WuDepartment of Stomatology, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a challenging malignancy with poor prognosis despite therapeutic advancements. This study seeks to derive a precise molecular subtyping and prognostic model for personalized treatment strategies. Methods: Multi-omics data from TCGA cohort was analyzed using consensus clustering algorithms for subtype classification. Based on the classification, a multi-omics cancer subtyping signature (MSCC) model was constructed using machine learning methods. The model's clinical utility was assessed by evaluating immune features and immunotherapy response. Potential therapeutic agents were identified through drug sensitivity analysis. Results: Three distinct OSCC subtypes with unique genetic and immunological profiles were identified. The MSCC model, developed using the StepCox [both]+plsRcox algorithm, demonstrated superior prognostic performance compared to existing models. High MSCC scores correlated with poor prognosis, reduced immune cell infiltration, and decreased likelihood of benefiting from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Docetaxel and paclitaxel emerged as potential therapeutic candidates. Conclusion: This multi-omics analysis unveiled subtype-specific differences in OSCC and established an MSCC model for predicting prognosis and treatment response. These findings provide a foundation for early diagnosis, molecular subtyping, and personalized treatment strategies in OSCC.

Indexed as

CA9immunotherapymachine learningmulti-omics analysisoral squamous cell carcinomaprognosis

Identifiers

PMID40703658
PMCPMC12283686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.