Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40703561›Full record

ArticleJournal of cultural cognitive science2025

Figure recognition and visual attention patterns behind the observation of Palaeolithic art.

María Silva-Gago, Marcos García-Diez, Emiliano Bruner, Luis M Martínez, Felipe Criado-Boado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cultural cognitive science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

María Silva-GagoInstituto de Ciencias del Patrimonio (INCIPIT), CSIC, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Marcos García-DiezDepartment of Prehistory, Ancient History and Archaeology, Universidad Complutense, Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain.
Emiliano BrunerMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN), CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Luis M MartínezInstituto de Neurociencias de Alicante (IN), CSIC-UMH, Alicante, Spain.
Felipe Criado-BoadoInstituto de Ciencias del Patrimonio (INCIPIT), CSIC, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Art visual processing is a complex cognitive process that involves perception, attention and decision-making. The initial stage of this process is characterized by visual exploration through rapid eye movements which can provide insights into attentional patterns and information processing and can be examined using eye-tracking technology. In this study, we employ eye-tracking to investigate visual perception during the observation of Palaeolithic rock art mostly from the Cantabrian seaboard, aiming to investigate the behavioural mechanisms underlying figure recognition and attentional distribution. This study comprises two experiments-one including entire panels and the other focusing exclusively on single figures-both yielding similar results. Our findings indicate that attention was predominantly directed towards the depicted figures, particularly their heads, rather than other elements within the visual field. Additionally, incomplete figures were perceived as complete, suggesting that figure recognition were influenced by Gestalt principles, internal cognitive models, and other top-down systems. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41809-025-00170-0.

Indexed as

Cognitive archaeologyEye-trackingGestaltGraphic representationPerceptionRock artVision

Identifiers

PMID40703561
PMCPMC12279578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.