ArticleDigital biomarkers
Hypertension Screening Using Acoustic Analysis and Machine Learning of Random Speech Samples: A Feasibility Study.
Article in Digital biomarkers. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hypertension is the leading risk factor for cardiovascular disorders. Early detection and initiation of treatment have been identified as the most effective ways to reduce the burden of hypertension. The most common method for detecting hypertension is blood pressure measurement, typically performed with cuff-based devices, where systolic pressure (SBP) and diastolic pressure (DBP) are measured through Korotkoff sounds. Although this method is accurate and non-invasive, it requires technical expertise and is often inaccessible in rural and remote areas. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of using overt speech (random speech corpora) through multiple short recordings for hypertension screening based on two hypertension guidelines: (1) SBP ≥135 mm Hg OR DBP ≥85 mm Hg, and (2) SBP ≥140 mm Hg OR DBP ≥90 mm Hg. Methods: We incorporated speech recordings from 573 participants (197 women) with diverse ages and body mass index and extracted temporal, spectral, and nonlinear acoustic features through three different frameworks, all of which are based on classical and boosted machine learning models. The models were evaluated using a leave-one-subject-out cross-validation scheme. Results: Our proposed pipeline achieved a balanced accuracy (BACC) of 61% for males and 70% for females under the relaxed criterion (SBP ≥135 OR DBP ≥85), and a BACC of 71% for males and 78% for females under the stricter European Society of Hypertension (ESH) guidelines (SBP ≥140 OR DBP ≥90). Conclusion: These results demonstrate the potential of employing overt speech alongside acoustic analysis for hypertension screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.